Our Attorneys
Picture of Nicholas Perino

Nicholas Perino

Senior Associate Attorney
nperino@robertjsemrad.com
Download VCard

Direct: 312-256-8731
Fax: 312-447-7815


Nic Perino joined Robert J. Semrad & Associates in 2006.  He is a senior associate and a member of both the bankruptcy and litigation departments. Mr. Perino’s primary practice focus is counseling and representing Debtors in Chapter 7 and 13 bankruptcy.  Mr. Perino has successfully defended and settled numerous adversary proceedings relating to allegations of fraud against consumer debtors.

Mr. Perino also serves on the U.S. Bankruptcy Court’s volunteer attorney panel.  Members of the panel help represent indigent parties on a pro bono basis in discrete adversary proceedings and contested matters.

Mr. Perino earned his law degree from Duquesne University School of Law.  During law school, Mr. Perino worked for the Office of the Pennsylvania Attorney General.  A member of the Charitable Trusts and Organizations division, he helped enforce the proper use of gifts from deceased individuals to the Commonwealth’s numerous charitable organizations.

Mr. Perino was born and raised in Erie, Pennsylvania.  He earned his Bachelor’s of Science from Penn State University.

Education

J.D., Duquesne University School of Law, 2006

B.S., The Pennsylvania State University, 2002

Jurisdictions Admitted to Practice

Illinois

Professional & Bar Association Memberships

Illinois State Bar Association

Chicago Bar Association

American Bankruptcy Institute

Notable Representative Cases

Alliant Credit Union v. Dorothy M. Baptiste, 430 B.R. 507 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2010)  Defense First Chair – Trial for determination of dischargeability under § 523
Successful defense of complaint against Debtor for fraud under § 523
Trial proved no intent to defraud and the asserted affirmative defenses of laches and waiver would have barred recovery had fraud been established.

In re Theodore A. Thompson, 426 B.R. 759 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2010): First Chair – Trial on remand for determination of Debtor’s damages
Panel of the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that refusal to return a lawfully repossessed vehicle to Chapter 13 Debtor post-petition was a violation of § 362 and remanded for determination of whether sanctions were warranted for GMAC’s failure to return the vehicle.
Actual damages granted; Punitive damages denied.

We checked out three bankruptcy firms in all. They all cost about the same, but DebtStoppers did a lot more for the money. DebtStoppers was an easy choice.

- SL

» Read More

The credit cards were really hurting us. Eliminating those interest payments made all the difference. Thanks, DebtStoppers! ...


— SL

» Read More

When they started taking money out of my check, I knew I needed help. My bankruptcy attorney got them to stop the garnishment that same day ...

— Rosemary S.

» Read More

I got my car back, which is great, but the best part is I got my car payment lowered, too ...
— DJ.

» Read More

It turned out that the finance company violated our rights. So DebtStoppers sued them in court and collected over $10,000 in damages. Our attorney really
went the distance for us.

» Read More


*

Why are you considering bankruptcy? (select all that apply)








What bills do you have? (select all that apply)







Do you own real estate?
If Yes, are you behind in these payments?

Do you own an automobile?
If Yes, are you behind in these payments?

Do you have any additional assetsworth more than $1000.00?
What types of income do you have? (select all that apply)





$
* * * *